California College of Midwives’ VBAC Statement
Here is everything you ever wanted to know about VBAC in relation to:
- Ca LMs and Overview of VBAC Controversies
- AB 1308 and the politics of ACOG and the MBC
- Why the historical development of obstetrics as a surgical speciality that routinely used general anesthesia, episiotomy and forceps still negatively influences the practice and billing codes for obstetrical medicine today (normal childbirth is still billed as a “surgical procedure”)
Links to Preamble ~ Parts 1, 2 & 3
Links to CCM’s VBAC Statement, parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5
Three-part Preamble : |
Part 1: High CS Rate & 50% Hospitals Ban VBACs:
|
Part 2: The Obstetricalization of Normal Maternity Care ~ 1910 to 1980-ish
|
|
Part 3 ~ Developing a Rational Maternity Care out of the Ashes of our Illogical Obstetric-centric System
|
|
Links to CCM’s VBAC Statement, parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 |
|
4-part VBAC Statement
|
part 1 ~ Ca LMs and Overview of VBAC Controversies
|
Part 2 ~ Cesarean rates & risks; availability of VBAC
|
|
Part 3 ~ Cost of high CS rate & low VBAC rate, hospital VBAC bans
|
|
Part 4 ~ The Post-Cesarean Problem for California Mothers & Midwives
|
|
Part 5 ~ VBAC Concluding Statement (part 5)A Better Way ~
|